that assessment does not address the sociological reality that Robert observed. how about you take a crack at it...
Read it again...
that assessment does not address the sociological reality that Robert observed. how about you take a crack at it...
Read it again...
When Lines 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, shuttles 8,9,10,11,12 get fully rendered and feeder systems are in place, you'll see the same as the places listed above in your quoted post.
I'm sure by line 5, the government would have exhausted every available line of credit, including drug money and the owner of Delta Commercial would have retired a billionaire on all the Lexus and Prado's he has sold. Please, enough of the feeder routes, we have been hearing about these for years now.
You could run a line up the middle of Churchill and Lincoln tomorrow and it would not make a difference. Now why is that?
Clearly for the Metro to be successful it must be capable of fulfilling a need. If it doesn't go where people want to go or if they have to pay for surface transport to the metro and then the metro itself, this is a problem.
Attitudes can be changed by slick marketing. This is done all the time. Why a billionaire would choose to eat at McDonalds is beyond my understanding, but some seem to be "loving it..."
First comes the product, then comes the campaign to show people why they need said product and how the product will change their lives for the better. Dominican's aren't all complete idiots. Some just seem to have a differing point of reference than those of us who have grown up and lived under completely different realities for most of our lives.
To be perfectly honest, I doubt the Metro was ever intended to woo the Lotus drivers in SD. It is/can be a means for the "masses to commute Mon-Fri faster and more comfortably than is available by surface means. The eventual success or failure of this endeavor is in the hands of the operator to complete and expand the service going forward and in the hands of the customers who will always migrate towards something better if they can shown it is in fact better. Change takes time and sometimes to change attitudes takes even longer.
Then there is the concho, taxi, bus unions & associations who would be opposed to anything Metro related on principle alone.
I am a firm believer in the concept that "most people" will eventually act and make decisions that are in their own best interests; not everyone and not all the time.
I have to defer to those who have more experience and knowledge of the cultural intricacies of Dominican society as I have very limited first hand experience. We'll just have to wait and see what happens over time. If the pricing, the cleanliness and usefulness remains the same or improves, I don't see ridership numbers decreasing. I expect it will be a steady upward curve - maybe a slow one.
Imagine having to stand next to your maid or the guy that cleans your car on the Metro, how uncouth!
It will take time and time is something we have much of to do so.
It takes more than just two very limited lines to get people with more than one commute a day to board the Metro.
Generally speaking, the more likes added, the more chances that these sectors of society will make regular use of it.
After all, there's no point to take the Metro to work if you still need to go fetch the car to pick up the dry cleaned clothes or a run for some donuts for the kids. Limitations are what we have now, but the impact was more felt and intended to center around the least economically well to do.
Keep in mind, that each of those sites you listed had the same stigma problems when social/economic classes met.
The Metro is NOT considered for the poor onto itself by the middle and upper classes in the DR, but more accessible to the less to do, rightly so due to the location of the stations and service areas for now.
When Lines 1,2,3,4,5,6,7, shuttles 8,9,10,11,12 get fully rendered and feeder systems are in place, you'll see the same as the places listed above in your quoted post.
The SD Metro is going to continue growing until it covers the entirety the city Santo Domingo. Then from there it will expand beyond the city and well into the surrounding burbs on the province itself.
As it is now, The city proper is dense. When the Metro covers well enough of the city to travel sans car, the density will be suffocating.
Yep, right on the mark.exactly. guys from Darien, CT, and the ritzy Westchester suburbs, ride the Metro North, because they have nothing to prove, nor anyone to impress. people in developing countries who own cars need to be seen in them. they would rather walk than have the hoi polloi seeing them riding public transportation.
The key to making the metro more successful really is the feeder lines. I would have no problem riding the metro every day, but once I'm off and trying to finish my trip, I ain't cramming myself into a Corolla with 6 other persons.
If there were comfortable buses taking me closer to home, it would be a different ball game.
All I see is another guaranteed win for Leonel in upcoming elections. When your rich have nice cars and can scam at the highest level, you are praised upon by the masses here. They don't even care if it comes out of their pockets, they are too busy being in awe! 2016 is now a lock!
the thing i have with DR constructing this and building that is that there seems to be little follow up. how many projects have been financed, inaugurated and abandoned?