I have been in the tourism industry for over 8 years and have a project which puts me in constant contact with the Ministries of Tourism & Culture, CESTUR and AMET.
I also deal with international travel agents on a consistent basis.
One observation regarding gubmint function in the DR: they may be slow, but they are NOT stupid.
Tourism will pick up on the North Coast when TRAVEL AGENTS refer their clients there. And for many years, through today, they refer virtually none of their clients to the Sosua area. None. I won't go into the reasons because they have been beaten to death here.
I don't understand why anyone is surprised with bar closings, barriers put in place, and a general cracking down on certain activities aimed at certain groups. The message has been very clear for some time. The future has been broadcast loudly. Whether or not you agree with it is irrelevant. They have *zero* concern with businesses who cater to certain groups, none, nada; if nothing else, those very people---the powers that be---may be real estate vultures, picking the flesh off the bones when those businesses become insolvent. And, for better or worse, the powers aren't that concerned about what those who have chosen certain career paths do, although educational programs are available to all. Call it what you wish: mean, uncaring, heartless, etc.: it is what it is.
The travel agents will not begin sending clients until things change, period. Investment won't come until the area is cleaned up. Consider the situation just another case of urban renewal for the purpose of regentrification. And seriously: the powers that be, hypocrites or not, truly don't care what certain Sosua constituents think. Not one bit.
And for every monger who drops the princely sum of $200 a day, there are maybe 25 non-mongers who drop $150+ a day who don't come because their travel agent won't make referrals. What do I base my numbers on? Conversations with travel agencies.
And one more comment: The DR is strongly beholden to the World Bank and IMF. Few have any great insight into how such groups dole out financing to countries in need. I happen to know from my educational background. When a loan is approved, pretty much all we hear is the $$$ involved. What is rarely made public---and neither group pushes transparency with those documents---are the "side deals", some of which are social engineering components that become benchmarks for future financial assistance. One such component in many deals to the Third World (yes, I know the DR is not "Third World", per se; however to urbane international "high-bred" bureaucrats it might as well be...) include a "human trafficking" benchmark. And make no mistake: these PC bureaucrats consider prostitution "human trafficking" and exploitation of poor women. So the DR must demonstrate efforts to meet these benchmarks for future financial assistance. Effectiveness is secondary to appearance of effort.
Once again, not passing judgement, but "it is what it is."