Coronavirus - In the DR

Status
Not open for further replies.

jd426

Gold
Dec 12, 2009
10,097
3,423
113
Blue Collar Town in New Jersey
We have yet to learn if our reproductive systems have been impacted by the gene altering effects of a mutating covid effect at the celular level.
The WARNING LABEL CLEARLY STATES to NOT Engage in any sort of Procreating activities for at least a MONTH , or BIRTH DEFECTS are very highly Possible .
What does that tell you ?
 

drstock

Silver
Oct 29, 2010
5,199
2,771
113
Cabarete
I don't see that. It's a personal decision, no more no less. I'm not afraid of it nor do I want it, nor will I take it.
And I say exactly the same to you. It's not that people who take precautions have an irrational FEAR, as you suggested, of Covid-19, but it's my personal decision to be in favour of the restrictions to prevent its spread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael DR

drstock

Silver
Oct 29, 2010
5,199
2,771
113
Cabarete
The WARNING LABEL CLEARLY STATES to NOT Engage in any sort of Procreating activities for at least a MONTH , or BIRTH DEFECTS are very highly Possible .
What does that tell you ?
If it says that, it says to me not to engage in any sort of Procreating activities for at least a MONTH , or BIRTH DEFECTS are very highly Possible. I'm not considering trying to procreate now, so I'll take the vaccine when available.
 

bob saunders

Platinum
Jan 1, 2002
33,703
7,099
113
dr1.com
If it says that, it says to me not to engage in any sort of Procreating activities for at least a MONTH , or BIRTH DEFECTS are very highly Possible. I'm not considering trying to procreate now, so I'll take the vaccine when available.
In the UK they are advising those that plan to have children in the next three years not to take the vaccine, they also tell breastfeeding women not to take it.
 

NanSanPedro

Nickel with tin plating
Apr 12, 2019
7,958
6,872
113
Boca Chica
yeshaiticanprogram.com
And I say exactly the same to you. It's not that people who take precautions have an irrational FEAR, as you suggested, of Covid-19, but it's my personal decision to be in favour of the restrictions to prevent its spread.

Your logic is bad.

I'm not getting the vaccine. If you want it, take it. That's pretty much it.
 

Garyexpat

Bronze
Sep 7, 2012
2,107
743
113
  • Like
Reactions: Caonabo

lifeisgreat

Enjoying Life
May 7, 2016
3,380
1,246
113

I guess more than 2 doses of the vaccine are necessary.
94% effective guess he in 6 %
 

jd426

Gold
Dec 12, 2009
10,097
3,423
113
Blue Collar Town in New Jersey
In the UK they are advising those that plan to have children in the next three years not to take the vaccine, they also tell breastfeeding women not to take it.
Exactly..
and yet if you try to GOOGLE this stuff .. you can NOT even find it .
Or find the OPPOSITE "not to worry its ok" type info..
The DANGER is REAL ... and we will see the Fallout in a year or so from the cases where people dont heed the Warnings ..
 

nanita

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
321
514
93
If you take people on this site as your guide, it seems that what most people are scared of is the vaccine. Luckily, worldwide, they're in the minority.
Not at all. Local polls published in my area (BC interior) show nearly half of people either don't want or are unsure about the vaccine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Garyexpat

nanita

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
321
514
93
Could somebody please cave my head in with a claw hammer when ( or if, hopefully) I get so old and lonely that I have to take to dr1 to proclaim I am full of testosterone because I choose to refuse insert whatever.
Can someone please tie a plastic bag around my head when I get so desperate that I have to convince everyone to take an experimental, rushed vaccine that apparently doesn't even prevent the virus it's intended to help?
 

nanita

Well-known member
Jul 28, 2014
321
514
93
Just a friendly reminder that Johnson & Johnson has paid out BILLIONS in damages to people who contracted cancer from their talcum powder. Internal company records, trial testimony and other evidence show that from at least 1971 to the early 2000s, J&J's talc tested positive for asbestos. They knew, of course, and continued to sell their asbestos-laced products. Trusting parents applied the carcinogenic product to their babies for decades.
An evil company.
 

scot_tosh

Well-known member
May 21, 2010
681
335
63
Can someone please tie a plastic bag around my head when I get so desperate that I have to convince everyone to take an experimental, rushed vaccine that apparently doesn't even prevent the virus it's intended to help?

The only part of the development of the vaccines was the funding for the different stages was in place at the start, due to covid ravaging the rich world and funded the research to the hilt. The vaccines may not stop you contracting the virus but will prevent it killing you, that's good enough for me
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael DR

Garyexpat

Bronze
Sep 7, 2012
2,107
743
113
Just a friendly reminder that Johnson & Johnson has paid out BILLIONS in damages to people who contracted cancer from their talcum powder. Internal company records, trial testimony and other evidence show that from at least 1971 to the early 2000s, J&J's talc tested positive for asbestos. They knew, of course, and continued to sell their asbestos-laced products. Trusting parents applied the carcinogenic product to their babies for decades.
An evil company.
Yes Nanita, but unfortunately Big Pharma has a free pass on any liability associated with the vaccines. So I guess the question is, will they be more careful or less???
 
Last edited by a moderator:

PICHARDO

One Dominican at a time, please!
May 15, 2003
13,280
893
113
Santiago de Los 30 Caballeros
I see island fever has set in.....

This is the truth, no gimmicks...
Will only get worst as demands become more forceful from strong economies.
 

Attachments

  • BF481D86-DF80-4801-B20D-8E503F813C32.jpeg
    BF481D86-DF80-4801-B20D-8E503F813C32.jpeg
    722.6 KB · Views: 171
  • Sad
Reactions: Michael DR
Status
Not open for further replies.