Got it JD.Yep. We're on the same page. I think he misunderstood I was emphasizing how few deaths there have been.
Got it JD.Yep. We're on the same page. I think he misunderstood I was emphasizing how few deaths there have been.
If you take people on this site as your guide, it seems that what most people are scared of is the vaccine. Luckily, worldwide, they're in the minority.People don't seem to want to understand that. They're scared.
I don't see that. It's a personal decision, no more no less. I'm not afraid of it nor do I want it, nor will I take it.If you take people on this site as your guide, it seems that what most people are scared of is the vaccine. Luckily, worldwide, they're in the minority.
The WARNING LABEL CLEARLY STATES to NOT Engage in any sort of Procreating activities for at least a MONTH , or BIRTH DEFECTS are very highly Possible .We have yet to learn if our reproductive systems have been impacted by the gene altering effects of a mutating covid effect at the celular level.
And I say exactly the same to you. It's not that people who take precautions have an irrational FEAR, as you suggested, of Covid-19, but it's my personal decision to be in favour of the restrictions to prevent its spread.I don't see that. It's a personal decision, no more no less. I'm not afraid of it nor do I want it, nor will I take it.
If it says that, it says to me not to engage in any sort of Procreating activities for at least a MONTH , or BIRTH DEFECTS are very highly Possible. I'm not considering trying to procreate now, so I'll take the vaccine when available.The WARNING LABEL CLEARLY STATES to NOT Engage in any sort of Procreating activities for at least a MONTH , or BIRTH DEFECTS are very highly Possible .
What does that tell you ?
In the UK they are advising those that plan to have children in the next three years not to take the vaccine, they also tell breastfeeding women not to take it.If it says that, it says to me not to engage in any sort of Procreating activities for at least a MONTH , or BIRTH DEFECTS are very highly Possible. I'm not considering trying to procreate now, so I'll take the vaccine when available.
In the UK they are advising those that plan to have children in the next three years not to take the vaccine, they also tell breastfeeding women not to take it.
And I say exactly the same to you. It's not that people who take precautions have an irrational FEAR, as you suggested, of Covid-19, but it's my personal decision to be in favour of the restrictions to prevent its spread.
94% effective guess he in 6 %![]()
Dominican Congressman for the NY-13 District tests positive for COVID-19 after receiving two doses of the vaccine
<p>The Dominican congressman for the NY-13 District, Adriano Espaillat, notified that he has tested positive for COVID-19, after having been vaccinated with the two doses and that he is in quarantine, receiving instructions from his doctor. The congressman was in Washington this week, where this...dominicantoday.com
I guess more than 2 doses of the vaccine are necessary.
Exactly..In the UK they are advising those that plan to have children in the next three years not to take the vaccine, they also tell breastfeeding women not to take it.
Not at all. Local polls published in my area (BC interior) show nearly half of people either don't want or are unsure about the vaccine.If you take people on this site as your guide, it seems that what most people are scared of is the vaccine. Luckily, worldwide, they're in the minority.
Can someone please tie a plastic bag around my head when I get so desperate that I have to convince everyone to take an experimental, rushed vaccine that apparently doesn't even prevent the virus it's intended to help?Could somebody please cave my head in with a claw hammer when ( or if, hopefully) I get so old and lonely that I have to take to dr1 to proclaim I am full of testosterone because I choose to refuse insert whatever.
Can someone please tie a plastic bag around my head when I get so desperate that I have to convince everyone to take an experimental, rushed vaccine that apparently doesn't even prevent the virus it's intended to help?
Think I'll stay with my 99% chance of it not killing me.94% effective guess he in 6 %
Yes Nanita, but unfortunately Big Pharma has a free pass on any liability associated with the vaccines. So I guess the question is, will they be more careful or less???Just a friendly reminder that Johnson & Johnson has paid out BILLIONS in damages to people who contracted cancer from their talcum powder. Internal company records, trial testimony and other evidence show that from at least 1971 to the early 2000s, J&J's talc tested positive for asbestos. They knew, of course, and continued to sell their asbestos-laced products. Trusting parents applied the carcinogenic product to their babies for decades.
An evil company.
I see island fever has set in.....