Nobody says it is easy. Nobody says there are guarantees.
Nobody says life is fair. And no amount of gubmint social engineering will either make life fair or make it easy.
Your anti-government stance is well-known-government in all it's forms seems to be the root of all evil in your eyes. My question to you is, does this preclude you from seeing the gray areas of this discussion or is it all just black or white?
As for government social engineering, I don't understand what you mean by this. If you mean people standing on some line expecting handouts, we already have something like this firmly entrenched-it's called lobbying, which exists for one reason only, the perpetuation of corporate welfare which I will argue has done more to erode our governmental process than any down-on-his-luck loser applying for medicaid.
Just like government in the DR is geared not towards solving problems but to perpetuate the pigs-at-the-trough mentality that is at the heart of DR politics.
Here is my point-I firmly believe that the best and brightest should not be dragged into the mud because the system caters to the mediocre.
My local elementary school has all the facilities and classrooms for special needs children, whether the disabilities are behavioral, cognitive or physical. But not one class for gifted children. That is a crime. The disciplinary statutes make it so that one child with behavior/attitude problems can literally hold an entire classroom hostage and there isn't a thing anyone can do about it. That is another crime. Low income parents with bright children have to suffer these types of conditions with hardly any recourse whatsoever.
The legacy of a bad education can very well be a life of unfulfilled potential, for those who have potential. These are the types of burdens that can and should be ameliorated. An investment in those who show aptitude can go a long way for any country.
Case in point-
A few years ago the University of Texas hired it's first African American math department chairman. When he began there were a handful of black math majors, I believe the number was less than 10. When he left a few years later, that number rose to 114.
How did this happen? It wasn't by magic or Affirmative Action. It happened by breaking barriers. The math chairman broke up the Asian study hall cliques and integrated them. When other math students saw the Asian students struggling with the same problems they were, it broke that psychological wall that Asians were innately smarter at math than students of other races.
The black and latino math majors took confidence in this and began doing better themselves. This did not take any extra funds or a government mandate targeting the less fortunate for social and intellectual enrichment.
The breaking of these barriers sets a precedent for those who come after. No need for handouts or special treatment. And everybody wins.
But one fact IS for sure: IF you don't try, IF you don't give a total effort, IF you make excuses for yourself, IF you quit, IF you wait for gubmint to bail you out...you will NOT succeed in life.
Total effort =/ success
No total effort=failure
So success DOES start with effort an willingness to do all necessary to become successful. That is the common trait within all successful people.
I hope you see that I am in total agreement with you. I never said otherwise. But in lieu of the financial bailouts and the massive amounts of corporations who do business in this country who are exempt from federal taxes, who collect massive amounts of corporate welfare in the form of low or in many cases no interest loans and profit from all manner of pork legislation, your fixation on individual responsibility seems a little misplaced.
The government in the DR is a self-perpetuating den of entitlement. It exists as a money grab, nothing more. Which is why in 20 years the posters of DR1 will be talking about the same things-the bad roads, the traffic, the electrical problem, etc.
This stagnation of intellectual thought among it's leaders was evident when Leonel declared that he would not entertain the idea of holding presidential debates because he felt his opponents were not intellectually up to the task, or something to that effect.
Even the biggest "bruto" sitting in a colmado can articulate a semi-coherent sentence to defend himself. But apparently this skill is beyond the average DR politician, so they console themselves with engaging in political campaigns the old fashioned way-handing out salamis, bread and a few hundred pesos to the masses.
All of leading to the same thing-the same thieves sharing in the spoils of tax revenues that should be earmarked to move the country forward.
This type of intellectual and moral inbreeding is the major cause of the problems in both the DR and the US. It is the same interests at play and the same people looking after themselves and their clans. Where is the "individual responsibility" in that?