It took a while for the Santiago Beltway to have its most important stretch finished. Look at it now.
The same with many other highways in the country.
Regarding Sosua, it has taken years ( and seems it will be years more of snail paced construction) on Sosua beach to replace the squalid shacks.The north coast between Puerto Plata and Cabarete is the least touristic area of the country affected by informal developments (not counting Bayahibe and Punta Cana proper and Cap Cana which are private developments, the equivalent to the north coast would be Verón, El Cortecito, Friusa, etc.) Boca Chica is a perfect example of a touriatic area where the government has abandoned for the most part.
The old center of Puerto Plata has received the most investment from the government of all historic center in the country with perhpas the Colonial Zone being the only exception.
The government has accepted investments from two cruise lines to the point Puerto Plata now has two cruises ship ports-of-call and now leads the nation in the amount of cruise passengers that visit the DR.
Banreservas is now working on the development of Playa Bergantín next to Playa Dorada which wil, have many new resorts and other stuff that would compete with the overall better resorts in Bávaro than in the North Coast.
The government has been working on improvements meant for playa Sosúa.
The La Puntilla area of Puerto Plata where the fortress is located was recently redone and included the creation of the largest government build amphitheater, which by the way is used for cultural events.
The area is getting more resources from the government for the benefit of its tourism, certainly more than in Bávaro where I think the largest government investment there was under Danilo with finishing the Boulevard del Este. Almost everything in Bávaro/Punta Cana has been created by the private sector with hardly the government being involved. That's not the case with Puerto Plata and vicinity.
During the years of Leonel it was also common for people in the North Coast to say the area was abandoned by the government, when in fact Puerto Plata province got more government investments on a per capita basis than anywhere else in the country including Santo Domingo.
I thought it was launch pad to change lanes!Well I drove the bridge yesterday and all I can say is that is one of the poorest asphalt jobs - it was obviously rushed. Very poor surface control, quite lumpy.
and the transition to the West side abutment is odd. You can see it in the photos of the railing where it looks like a dip in it. They didn't account for the camber in the bridge to a level abutment - they needed a sloped abutment - but oh well it beats the bypass.
And no William - that railing is not 'temporary'
Did they put on the finish coat of asphalt? I don't recall seeing any steam rollers in the videos. Maybe not used on bridges(?).Well I drove the bridge yesterday and all I can say is that is one of the poorest asphalt jobs - it was obviously rushed. Very poor surface control, quite lumpy.
and the transition to the West side abutment is odd. You can see it in the photos of the railing where it looks like a dip in it. They didn't account for the camber in the bridge to a level abutment - they needed a sloped abutment - but oh well it beats the bypass.
And no William - that railing is not 'temporary'
45 years working in the road building business. Not behind a deskLots of bridge building and asphalting professionals in this thread.
Generally bridges only get one layer. Multiple layers give a roadway more strength, a bridge already has strength in the concrete and structural beams. On a bridge the asphalt is finished with rollers but only in static mode, no vibrators.Did they put on the finish coat of asphalt? I don't recall seeing any steam rollers in the videos. Maybe not used on bridges(?).
On roads, it seems to me there is a notable visible difference between the base layer and the finish, or, top layer. The base layer is "grainier". There's a big difference in road noise generated by the tires when driving over a base layer vs a top layer, too.Generally bridges only get one layer. Multiple layers give a roadway more strength, a bridge already has strength in the concrete and structural beams. On a bridge the asphalt is finished with rollers but only in static mode, no vibrators.
Asphalt is always compacted. I didn't see any video of what they used but it was likely rubber tired rollers (pneumatic) and maybe a small steel rollerDid they put on the finish coat of asphalt? I don't recall seeing any steam rollers in the videos. Maybe not used on bridges(?).
If that's the case, heavy trucks are going to destroy that asphalt and it will need repaving soon.Asphalt is always compacted. I didn't see any video of what they used but it was likely rubber tired rollers (pneumatic) and maybe a small steel roller
Using a heavy vibratory would have destroyed that fresh concrete below. The deck was not adequately cured because of the rush to open.
But the issue is that it wasn't properly laid down or level raked and it's also just telescoping the undulating concrete below.
It's as lumpy as some DR restaurants' mashed potatoes.
With extra heavy use , in high temperatures , it gets very deep RUTS in it , that is when you know its Time.If that's the case, heavy trucks are going to destroy that asphalt and it will need repaving soon.