euhmmm... anybody consider the success of Ikea??? Their policy is to make their employees profit from their success... so they pay wages slightly over the market rate... but do demand high dedication of their employees...
They have several policies, variating from country to country, in which employees benefit from the year-end result...
I know they stunted in Belgium, 2 years ago, by telling their employees, that all profits, generated on the 24th of December, would be divided between the employees (80%), and charitable causes (20%)....
They only asked that the employees worked for free that day, and that their pay would depend on the profits made... It was a huge success... Each employee took, on average, more than 20-fold, on what they would make on an average working day...
Ikea, in my opinion, is a huge company, making lousy furniture, which you have to assemble yourself with a manual which makes no sense at all, at high prices.... nevertheless they are hugely successful, and no, not all of this success can be due to their fabulous meatballs...
In my opinion Knights has kind of the right idea... personally, I would prefer to let the personnel profit from the profits made by the company, instead of paying higher wages immediately, and I would like to see the company doing this without charging higher prices for their end-products...
By this they will not be creating a potentially "dangerous" imbalance in the market, and they will give their people an incentive to perform well...
If that scheme works, and because of this the afore-mentioned companies B &C (which btw is the largest company in the world of producing cheap publicity t-shirts... lol, and has nothing to do with this thread), get into trouble... so be it... and they will not go bankrupt if they, in turn, adapt...