Pichardo, your point about the lingering effects of Truijllo, including the financial legacy, is very well put and extremely important when one is attempting to understand Dominican Republic's current political and cultural situation.
The shadow of Trujillo is cast long and wide, and there is still a lingering tendency toard self-censorship and implicate mistrust. The financial legacy is the iceburg beneath the surface.
Why is it the interest rates are so exorbitant that only few are able to start or grow a business? While difficult to prove, the answer is that much of the nation's wealth is controled and managed by remnants of the Trujillo regime, who establish the interest rates simply to keep the money within a privlegded inner circle.
As in any investigation, one needs to ask "cui bono?" Who benefits from a system that promotes fear, limits economic participation, and sabotages effective education? Well, the answer again is those who consolidated power after Truijllo's assasination, the same people who were more than likely conspirators in his murder, and now want to revise history with tall tales of Truijllo's "good works."
Just some food for thought, and I'm sure the academic historians will line up to dispute these conclusions. However remember, I do not personally benefit from any of this. You have to decide for yourselves who are protecting which interests, and for what reason.