These are difficult questions no? I mean, is it the legal responsibility of a country to take in refugees from a neighbor? I think without a legal framework in place - the answer (legally speaking) is no. Is it there a moral responsibility to help? I think so. But, that moral responsibility does not necessarily equate to "open the floodgates." There are cars, trucks, ships, and helicopters which can transport necessary goods and professionals to almost any site of humanitarian crisis in the world.
Also, I think your point of view undermines, at least somewhat, the idea of having a country in the first place. I mean, if it is assumed that a country is a collection of people who work together for the benefit of all its citizens, and put that benefit before the benefit of outsiders, then it is clear why the DR would not be falling all over themselves to welcome destitute people from Haiti into the country.
It's not like this country is feeding, clothing, and educating its own citizens. The DR is failing miserably. So, to say that rejecting entry to earthquake refugees is not humanitarian, in a country with little resources, is to potentially lower the status of Dominicans who are struggling to get by. Their earth quakes every morning when there is no breakfast. Their earth quakes every night when there is no luz, no water, and no food. Shouldn't they get first crack at their own resources? I don't think it is morally wrong to agree to help Haitians after the earthquake, but do so on the Haitian side of the border.
You obviously missed the objective of my post. I never made a litigious argument, in fact, throughout the post, my contention has always been humanitarian based. Your definition of "humanitarian" is flawed because you've interwoven it's merits to economics. Lacking funds or tools in a disaster are often reinforced by international aid organizations in order to bolster, or augment whatever is deficient at a given geographic location. Today the earthquake was centered on the Haitian side. Tomorrow, who knows?
And yes, the floodgates were open due to this crisis, as happens everywhere in this world during a disaster. The cars, trucks, helicopters, ships did reach their intended target, but the initial coordination or logistics were performed by the Dominicans for obvious reasons.
Due to the epic disaster, many of these victims were transferred to the DR because Haiti was already living with less than the basic if needs. Serious trauma cases were transferred to several hospitals on the Dominican side. Despite their history of conflicts, it was almost as though those ancient and current strives were dismissed to address this disaster of horrific proportions.
I've always stated how welcoming Dominicans are to Haitians; even though in most cases the reason being is exploitation of their labor. The border regions are also porous and the weekly bi-national markets are a great exhibitor for illegals. More control and innovative ways of thinking have to be implemented to reduce this uncontrollable influx of Haitian migrants.
Those rejected Dominicans living without breakfast, lunch, dinner, lights, water, education, employment, etc. also displayed their humanity by rescuing many Haitians seeking the most basic of needs. Imagine the latter providing for people, who overall, were in dire straits? The plum line was drawn and the sacrifice was made to render hearts instead of garments! This is humanity to the nth degree!
Of course, there were complaints by some sectors, as is their right, but overall, the kindness and generosity afforded to the Haitians was a living testimony of the warmth of the Dominicans in general.
The current discussion, again, isn't found in law books or even the laws of conventions. It's found in the hearts and souls of human beings ascending to their highest levels of morality.
