People can believe what they want based on what they want to believe, but for those that look for the evidence, its simply not there.
True, no further evidence has been displayed of money laundering activity in DR has been shown.
The prosecutor expressed an opinion.
Now, if I understand your point of view: a high ranking Justice Officer of this country express concerns in an international AML conference about the effects of money laundering. We should believe that this is just an "opinion with no evidence"?
Sorry, you're talking pure BS, and I admit that's just a personal opinion with no evidence.
Other people stating opinions without evidence:
"In spite of having the largest economy in the Caribbean, the Dominican Republic (DR) is not a major regional financial center. The DR continues to be a major transit point for the transshipment of illicit narcotics destined for the United States and Europe. The existence of six international airports, six major seaports, and a poorly controlled frontier with Haiti present the authorities with serious challenges. The existence of corruption within the government and the private sector, an organized crime presence (primarily illicit trafficking in narcotics and persons), a fragile economy and a large informal economy make the DR vulnerable to money laundering and terrorist financing threats. The major sources of laundered proceeds stem from illicit trafficking activities, tax evasion and fraudulent financial activity, particularly transactions with forged credit cards.
The DR is a major bulk cash smuggling hub. The smuggling of bulk cash by couriers and the use of wire transfer remittances are the primary methods for moving illicit funds from the United States into the DR. Once in the DR, currency exchange houses, money remittance companies, real estate and construction companies, and casinos are commonly used to facilitate the laundering of illicit funds. The lack of a single recognized financial intelligence unit exacerbates the problem, and the proposed creation of an offshore financial center may worsen the DR‟s vulnerability to money laundering.
There is a significant market for illicit or smuggled goods in the Dominican Republic; the funding sources are unclear, as is the destination of the proceeds. Authorities say the under-invoicing of imports and exports by Dominican Republic businessmen is still a relatively common practice. The primary goal for businessmen who engage in such activity is reportedly to avoid taxes and customs fees. Customs fraud and invoice manipulation are also found in regional value transfer schemes."
This is in the International Narcotics Control Strategy Report 2011 from the US State Department.
Was the Torre Atiemar case just an "accident" or just an example of common practice? There is no evidence (yet?).
Anybody when some common sense would say that when there is smoke, there might be some fire.
More specifically, in AML practice, at least in Europe, officers do not have to wait for evidence, if there is a reasonable doubt about the source of money.
Of course, he who wants to be blind doesn't see.
Barnab?