xamaicano said:Didn't Jayson Blair and Judith Miller work for that paper?
How does that deter from the fact it has some of the most professioal journalist of any newspaper?
xamaicano said:Didn't Jayson Blair and Judith Miller work for that paper?
aegap said:How does that deter from the fact it has some of the most professioal journalist of any newspaper?
xamaicano said:How can it not?
moviemouth said:.... for newspaper of record?
moviemouth said:.... for newspaper of record?
drbill said:OK, fine, a lefty-or righty-spin could be out there, but the message seems clear. What would you whisper in Leonel's ear, given the chance (and given that reelection is a non-starter)?
moviemouth said:The disturbing implication of the Times piece is that the Bush administration is apparently conducting foreign policy by resort to extra-constitutional means. ...QUOTE]
Actually that's not the message that comes across, more like the Bush administration has no control over it's own foreign policy, and that different departments and players within the U.S. government work dissonantly and at cross purposes.
Mirador said:moviemouth said:The disturbing implication of the Times piece is that the Bush administration is apparently conducting foreign policy by resort to extra-constitutional means. ...QUOTE]
Actually that's not the message that comes across, more like the Bush administration has no control over it's own foreign policy, and that different departments and players within the U.S. government work dissonantly and at cross purposes.
I disagree, but your take is disturbing enough for me. However, what do you think of the article's main thesis: That the mixed signals from the U.S. contributed to the demise of the Aristide gov't. which lead to even greater instability in Haiti than under the admittedly flawed Aristide regime in terms of potential impact on the DR.?
drbill said:OK, fine, a lefty-or righty-spin could be out there, but the message seems clear. What would you whisper in Leonel's ear, given the chance (and given that reelection is a non-starter)?
aegap said:The Dominican government was very suspicious of what the U.S was doing , but it didn't do anything so as to not compromise its own foreign policy goals. I believe is was the right thing.
aegap said:Yes, the Dominican government couldn't do anything even if it wanted to.... Haitians were the ones responsible for selling their country.
The OP posted this article in another board, it's even more critical of the U.S.government/taxpayers funded NGO involved.
aegap said:I apologize moviemouth. It was someone else that linked the salon article on the other site.
Quisqueya said:so the truth is out and what is going to change..nada What did we learn from this..Hmmm A so called democratic promoter toppled a democratic government and their rebuttal...Oops, it should have been dealt with differently..
And the DR government are co-conspirators in this plot but don't realize they will billed heavily turning a blind eye..Now we know for a fact haiti is in total chaos due to foreign country's interest everyone is leaving the country...Now poor haitians will fill yolas to south florida but will be intercepted by US coast guards and will all head to the DR..real smart DR government..real smart...