Jesus, we know it went up, yes I did not know this and now I do.
Why are you quoting a post from three months ago, a little strange, ay?
Just stating facts, ay.
Jesus, we know it went up, yes I did not know this and now I do.
Why are you quoting a post from three months ago, a little strange, ay?
Just stating facts, ay.
What facts?
I previously admitted I did not realize it went up from RD800 to RD2500.
No need to stalk my three month old posts, that is just creepy guy.
See if you can find Brent's remains.
Congresswoman Graciela Ferm?n Noes? (Puerto Plata) says it is.
Diputada Graciela Ferm?n demanda eliminen impuesto ilegal Migraci?n cobra a turistas al salir del pa?s | Detrasdelrumor.com.do
donP
I think we have always kind of known that the exit fee is more of a way to grab a few more pesos from foreigners than being an effective means of enforcing immigration policy. The amounts charged are not punitive for most foreigners and do nothing to alter behavior. I have no idea how much is collected over the course of a year but suspect it is not insignificant.
After reading the news story I am left with two thoughts.
1) The Diputada should be careful what she wishes for. With no means to "profit" from those over staying their tourist visa, there is absolutely no incentive to allow such activity to continue.
2) This may be a trail balloon sent aloft to gauge public reaction to the elimination of those fees at some point subsequent to June 16. No easy means of legitimizing an extended stay in the country will result in a rather awkward conversation with immigration when one does choose to leave and that may be the intended outcome.
I gather this exit fee program has been in existence since the dawn of time. I find it rather suspect that only now, in this time of immigration readjustment, a lowly Diputada would call for its repeal. I also have a hard time believing that a gringo family of four could be reduced to tears by a fee that they had to know of and probably have paid several times before.