T
Dumb-inican elite
The problem with the Dominican elite is that they usually live well above their means even if they have 100 million pesos.There behavior is reminiscent of the Spanish royalty of the 15 century.
These people make me sick.American rich folk or most of them live well below their means and have organizations to help the poor.Check Bill Gates and how he snubbed Leo Fdez with his cockamamy idea of a Cyber-park.He also snubbed Pres. Bush with his idea of removing some tax on the wealthy.He said that po' folk need help. Look at the Kennedys, you see these families have class.They don't flaunt riches,RESPECT the poor and VALUE their opinions.
Now their Dumb-inican colleagues have a DISDAIN for the poor, EXPLOIT them with subsistence wages and REJECT any ideas they have.
Haven't you noticed when Pres. CLINTON visited other lands how he had a humble countenance with an amicable disposition.He welcomed everyones opinion esp. the poor.
Death to that hierarchical and demeaning attitude demonstrated by elitists.
Death to the humiliation of the poor.
Long live the Onion and Carrots mentality
As I recall he had a long winded opinion on everything...............June 2001 he said that..... he's long gone
For being a new member sure did dig deep in the files...jjjJune 2001 he said that..... he's long gone
What are you tslking about? Most upper class Dominicans got their wealth after Trujillo. Of those that made it before, a large chunk did it during the Trujillo dictatorship. Upper class Dominicans of colonial origins are few in comparison. As if that's not enough, the characteristics of even the Dominican upper class from colonial times is a very modest existence, in many cases downright poverty. That goes back to the 17th century which is known as "The Century of Misery." Things got so bad for the Dominican upper class that classicism was bssed on peoples last names as the average lifestyle of a Dominican upper class family and those of the everyday people wasn't that different. Churches began to conduct masses in the very early hours of the morning because it was common for upper class ladies to not have a proper dress to attend mass. The darkness hide their poverty.Onions and carrots
Although many latin countries have cultures that love to show off what they have dealt with scarcity, lack as a results of colonialism. I have a friend from Cuba, nice person however, had issues collecting things, and only wears name brand in other words, pretty flashy and excessive. I asked them why were they this way?. They explained that back in Cuba they did not have much and now that they are well off they love to have the things that they would only have dreamed off. Here is "Onions and carrots", praising colonizers and their descents who's origine of wealth is questionable! not sure about the Kennedys so I cannot include them. These people have had an advantage over all other groups of people for centuries. They can possible have benefitted from generational wealth, some of this wealth can come from slavery. They were strategically given cheap loans and grants to own their land. They are given opportunities when it comes to businesses. It is well know and documented that the USA has not been fair in practices when it comes to the European Americans and all other groups. It is so easy to judge without adding all other factors. I think that you sound more dumb than anything... sir!
I know many of the original families in the Jarabacoa area were land rich but cash poor. They became cash rich by carefully selling properties when the demand and price were high.What are you tslking about? Most upper class Dominicans got their wealth after Trujillo. Of those that made it before, a large chunk did it during the Trujillo dictatorship. Upper class Dominicans of colonial origins are few in comparison. As if that's not enough, the characteristics of even the Dominican upper class from colonial times is a very modest existence, in many cases downright poverty. That goes back to the 17th century which is known as "The Century of Misery." Things got so bad for the Dominican upper class that classicism was bssed on peoples last names as the average lifestyle of a Dominican upper class family and those of the everyday people wasn't that different. Churches began to conduct masses in the very early hours of the morning because it was common for upper class ladies to not have a proper dress to attend mass. The darkness hide their poverty.
People need to stop applying ideas that may be appropriate to the USA to the DR. The premise isn't the same. A good example is slavery which was very different the one practiced in the DR in colonial times from the one practiced in the USA during and after colonial times. To mention one difference, the typical slave owner in the USA owned many along with their families. The slaves were the ones that did all the work. In the DR, the average slave owner had a handful, 5 tops in most cases. They were so few that slave owners got to know their slaves by name, it was common for the slaves to sit on the same table as the slave owner's family and everyone eat at the sametime. Slaves only did part of the work as more often the slave owner's themselves had to work the land along with the slaves. All of that and more, which began to take place in the 17th century, was due to the extreme poverty that affected everybody.
Even attitudes towards Haitians before they became their own country tended to be very linient, at times them receiving support for their revolution against the French. Things got so amicable, that the Dominican army* even accepted and incorporated many of the Haitians that fled into the Spanish part of the island early in the Haitian Revolution. The most notable was Jean François. In 1793 c. there was an invasion of Fort Dauphin (now Fort Liberté, Haiti.) The invasion was headed by the Dominican army** and the runaway Haitians that went to the Spanish part, this included Jean François. The invasion started in Dajabón and while the generals and the soldiers were not involved in the massacre of the French that lived in that town, leaving that to the Haitians that accompanied them with Jean François among them, non of the generals and soldiers gave help to any of the French that went to them as they were being pursued by their former slaves. The support towards the Haitians had reached that level. Attitudes began to change with the invasion of Toussaint Loverture in 1801 and of Jean Jacques Dessalines in 1805 which basically cemented an anti-Haitian feeling on much of the population due to the cruelties commited against the civilian population, even campesinos that lived scattered between the towns, by the Haitian soldiers on the others of Jean Jacques Dessalines. Most of the Dominicans alive today descend from the survivors of that attempted widespread massacre, the ones the manage to escape from the towns and lived in the woods. In La Vega almost the entire population that fled went into the mountains. That's when and how Jarabacoa was founded.
Something like that never happened in the USA. You can't simply apply USA concepts to the DR without taking into account that they have an extremely different history.
The average Dominican has a lineage that goes back to colonial times and even beyond. You will find more "colonials" among the average population than among the upper class. A good number of Dominicans have become darker and blacker after the country was formed mostly to to natural growth, further mixture with every generation and migration from Haiti, the English Caribbean and the African Americans thst migrated in the 1820's and settled everywhere.***
* Then the Spanish army, but Spaniards from the Iberian peninsula often were the generals and some of the soldiers that were from the Canary Islands, the rest were Dominicans; the same happened in Puerto Rico, Cuba and elsewhere in the Spanish Empire. The Spanish army in those places was composed mostly by locals.
** One of the generals had the last name Montalvo. During Danilo Medina's government there was a high ranking minister with that same last name. He also has similarities in looks with Antonio del Monte y Tejeda, another Dominican from colonial times. In both instances I was left wondering...
*** Today the colony of African Americans that settled in Samaná are the most notables because there was hardly any Dominican population when they settled there. Elsewhere in the DR the original African American populations "melted" as they took up Dominicsn men and women for partners. If there would had been a sizeable population in Samaná, the samething would had happened there.
Dude you could buzz kill a free weekend stay at the Playboy mansionWhat are you tslking about? Most upper class Dominicans got their wealth after Trujillo. Of those that made it before, a large chunk did it during the Trujillo dictatorship. Upper class Dominicans of colonial origins are few in comparison. As if that's not enough, the characteristics of even the Dominican upper class from colonial times is a very modest existence, in many cases downright poverty. That goes back to the 17th century which is known as "The Century of Misery." Things got so bad for the Dominican upper class that classicism was bssed on peoples last names as the average lifestyle of a Dominican upper class family and those of the everyday people wasn't that different. Churches began to conduct masses in the very early hours of the morning because it was common for upper class ladies to not have a proper dress to attend mass. The darkness hide their poverty.
People need to stop applying ideas that may be appropriate to the USA to the DR. The premise isn't the same. A good example is slavery which was very different the one practiced in the DR in colonial times from the one practiced in the USA during and after colonial times. To mention one difference, the typical slave owner in the USA owned many along with their families. The slaves were the ones that did all the work. In the DR, the average slave owner had a handful, 5 tops in most cases. They were so few that slave owners got to know their slaves by name, it was common for the slaves to sit on the same table as the slave owner's family and everyone eat at the sametime. Slaves only did part of the work as more often the slave owner's themselves had to work the land along with the slaves. All of that and more, which began to take place in the 17th century, was due to the extreme poverty that affected everybody.
Even attitudes towards Haitians before they became their own country tended to be very linient, at times them receiving support for their revolution against the French. Things got so amicable, that the Dominican army* even accepted and incorporated many of the Haitians that fled into the Spanish part of the island early in the Haitian Revolution. The most notable was Jean François. In 1793 c. there was an invasion of Fort Dauphin (now Fort Liberté, Haiti.) The invasion was headed by the Dominican army** and the runaway Haitians that went to the Spanish part, this included Jean François. The invasion started in Dajabón and while the generals and the soldiers were not involved in the massacre of the French that lived in that town, leaving that to the Haitians that accompanied them with Jean François among them, non of the generals and soldiers gave help to any of the French that went to them as they were being pursued by their former slaves. The support towards the Haitians had reached that level. Attitudes began to change with the invasion of Toussaint Loverture in 1801 and of Jean Jacques Dessalines in 1805 which basically cemented an anti-Haitian feeling on much of the population due to the cruelties commited against the civilian population, even campesinos that lived scattered between the towns, by the Haitian soldiers on the others of Jean Jacques Dessalines. Most of the Dominicans alive today descend from the survivors of that attempted widespread massacre, the ones the manage to escape from the towns and lived in the woods. In La Vega almost the entire population that fled went into the mountains. That's when and how Jarabacoa was founded.
Something like that never happened in the USA. You can't simply apply USA concepts to the DR without taking into account that they have an extremely different history.
The average Dominican has a lineage that goes back to colonial times and even beyond. You will find more "colonials" among the average population than among the upper class. A good number of Dominicans have become darker and blacker after the country was formed mostly to to natural growth, further mixture with every generation and migration from Haiti, the English Caribbean and the African Americans thst migrated in the 1820's and settled everywhere.***
* Then the Spanish army, but Spaniards from the Iberian peninsula often were the generals and some of the soldiers that were from the Canary Islands, the rest were Dominicans; the same happened in Puerto Rico, Cuba and elsewhere in the Spanish Empire. The Spanish army in those places was composed mostly by locals.
** One of the generals had the last name Montalvo. During Danilo Medina's government there was a high ranking minister with that same last name. He also has similarities in looks with Antonio del Monte y Tejeda, another Dominican from colonial times. In both instances I was left wondering...
*** Today the colony of African Americans that settled in Samaná are the most notables because there was hardly any Dominican population when they settled there. Elsewhere in the DR the original African American populations "melted" as they took up Dominicsn men and women for partners. If there would had been a sizeable population in Samaná, the samething would had happened there.
you love to say that things that happened in the USA did not Happen in DR what the heck are you talking about..... it shows you lack of knowledge. For starters go learn your own history I happened to mayor in it! I am not arguing with a "person" who still feels a kin way about Trujillo and it is soooo lost!What are you tslking about? Most upper class Dominicans got their wealth after Trujillo. Of those that made it before, a large chunk did it during the Trujillo dictatorship. Upper class Dominicans of colonial origins are few in comparison. As if that's not enough, the characteristics of even the Dominican upper class from colonial times is a very modest existence, in many cases downright poverty. That goes back to the 17th century which is known as "The Century of Misery." Things got so bad for the Dominican upper class that classicism was bssed on peoples last names as the average lifestyle of a Dominican upper class family and those of the everyday people wasn't that different. Churches began to conduct masses in the very early hours of the morning because it was common for upper class ladies to not have a proper dress to attend mass. The darkness hide their poverty.
People need to stop applying ideas that may be appropriate to the USA to the DR. The premise isn't the same. A good example is slavery which was very different the one practiced in the DR in colonial times from the one practiced in the USA during and after colonial times. To mention one difference, the typical slave owner in the USA owned many along with their families. The slaves were the ones that did all the work. In the DR, the average slave owner had a handful, 5 tops in most cases. They were so few that slave owners got to know their slaves by name, it was common for the slaves to sit on the same table as the slave owner's family and everyone eat at the sametime. Slaves only did part of the work as more often the slave owner's themselves had to work the land along with the slaves. All of that and more, which began to take place in the 17th century, was due to the extreme poverty that affected everybody.
Even attitudes towards Haitians before they became their own country tended to be very linient, at times them receiving support for their revolution against the French. Things got so amicable, that the Dominican army* even accepted and incorporated many of the Haitians that fled into the Spanish part of the island early in the Haitian Revolution. The most notable was Jean François. In 1793 c. there was an invasion of Fort Dauphin (now Fort Liberté, Haiti.) The invasion was headed by the Dominican army** and the runaway Haitians that went to the Spanish part, this included Jean François. The invasion started in Dajabón and while the generals and the soldiers were not involved in the massacre of the French that lived in that town, leaving that to the Haitians that accompanied them with Jean François among them, non of the generals and soldiers gave help to any of the French that went to them as they were being pursued by their former slaves. The support towards the Haitians had reached that level. Attitudes began to change with the invasion of Toussaint Loverture in 1801 and of Jean Jacques Dessalines in 1805 which basically cemented an anti-Haitian feeling on much of the population due to the cruelties commited against the civilian population, even campesinos that lived scattered between the towns, by the Haitian soldiers on the others of Jean Jacques Dessalines. Most of the Dominicans alive today descend from the survivors of that attempted widespread massacre, the ones the manage to escape from the towns and lived in the woods. In La Vega almost the entire population that fled went into the mountains. That's when and how Jarabacoa was founded.
Something like that never happened in the USA. You can't simply apply USA concepts to the DR without taking into account that they have an extremely different history.
The average Dominican has a lineage that goes back to colonial times and even beyond. You will find more "colonials" among the average population than among the upper class. A good number of Dominicans have become darker and blacker after the country was formed mostly to to natural growth, further mixture with every generation and migration from Haiti, the English Caribbean and the African Americans thst migrated in the 1820's and settled everywhere.***
* Then the Spanish army, but Spaniards from the Iberian peninsula often were the generals and some of the soldiers that were from the Canary Islands, the rest were Dominicans; the same happened in Puerto Rico, Cuba and elsewhere in the Spanish Empire. The Spanish army in those places was composed mostly by locals.
** One of the generals had the last name Montalvo. During Danilo Medina's government there was a high ranking minister with that same last name. He also has similarities in looks with Antonio del Monte y Tejeda, another Dominican from colonial times. In both instances I was left wondering...
*** Today the colony of African Americans that settled in Samaná are the most notables because there was hardly any Dominican population when they settled there. Elsewhere in the DR the original African American populations "melted" as they took up Dominicsn men and women for partners. If there would had been a sizeable population in Samaná, the samething would had happened there.