The prostitutes themselves for not having an alternative to make a living with given opportunity.There are many reasons and factors that drive people to become prostitutes, none of which involve having wanted to for the pleasure of it.There's no pleasure for the workers involved in prostitution, only the monetary gain, if much.
In the end nobody is talking about the chicas! How unfortunate.Too bad people cannot simply accept that men will pay for sex and women will provide it. It’s simply a physical act......making any form of sex between consenting adults illegal is unnecessary and victimizes the women and the men for no good reason... are they going to pass a law that sex with anyone not, say, within 4 years of their respective ages is illegal? Or a man can't buy dinner for a girl of more than say $25.00? Or that buying 3 drinks is okay but not 5! Going to a bar to meet the opposite sex and then to have sex is illegal...? Or parties can't have sex on a first date...!
Frankly I fail to see how sex for money is morally offensive, except in some antiquated, every animal in the world lived within walking distance of Noah, everything was made in 7 days, don't eat pork, but it is ok to beat your children and stone your women, sort of antiquated shepherd herding sort of morality.
The problem is, the same people who advance the rights of women seem to propagate that women cannot self choose how they want to use their bodies. And a women’s choice it is. Think of the old joke... in a North American bar ...” no man but every woman knows in advance if they will have sex later that night if they want it “... and in Sosua...”no women but every man knows if they will have sex later that night...”.
Frankly it makes no rational sense to govern by a criminal law with whom others can have consensual sex, and what kind, or when, or at what cost (leaving violence, rape and children issues obvious not included)?
Would all women want to provide sex for money.... no...? But some would, because it is easier and way more profitable.... Read for example Freakonomics on that chapter of prostitution... and Oscar Wild and the sex for a million dollars question ( we are just negotiating price) .
I know plenty of North American women who would provide sex for money... and should because it is their best skill: Adam Smith on Comparative Advantage for those women who are better at it.......
We consider paid for sex bad because ....its politically incorrect to actually say what majority of men think...their sexual urges are not being met by the women in their lives and men either live in a life of sexual frustration, or live in love with their right hand.... or have affairs and ruin marriages... or go to places like Sosua which have a tolerance...
Come to think of it , by and large all women have sex for money.. it is just paid differently and some women because of marriage can create a dictatorship of it... which of course leads to men seeking out women who will barter more generously for it
Too bad ....this will simply make sex in Sosua a gamble and the police will profit considerably... and those who buy up businesses in Sosua at bankruptcy prices.... for a while... when the local businesses are bought up at fire sale prices the crack down will stop... and what do you think will happen.... ?
In Sosua... yes I think that in that small village the economic effect will be disasterous to the economy... at least in the short run....you really think that the Pedro Clisante businesses will not collapse...?
But the chicas... well "let them eat cake" I say...