Hello SuperConejo,
Thank you for your reply I always welcome social intercouse that is based on science and not merely on romanticism or deep rooted beliefs based on "history" that was written by the conquerers and not by the conquered.
So let me start by responding to your post with the following:
(1) If we who have done dna testing and serious scientific study do not and cannot give as of yet anb accurate number of just how many Dominicans actually have Taino descent, then how can anyone who has not be so bold a state mater of factly that Taino is only 10% percent of the population?
As far as we are concerened there are places,very remote mind you where the dna sequencing has not been conducted and as of yet there is no way to know for sure.I can say that if of the 150 samples most of which were taken in Santo Domingo, are showing 33% then what will the percentages be when we go deep into the DR country side? Too soon to tell. But any good scientist will tell you that if we found ( as we did) 33% in a place where we did not expect it,then in the place where we do............the sky is the limit.
As far was the words are concerned, I wlll say that of the 55 rivers and tributataries we have in the DR only 3 have Spanish names, none have African names and 52 have Taino names. You mention words like chevere, mofongo and mangu and toto. Is that it?
I can give you 5 words in Taino that are recognisable by Dominicans for every african word you can give me. Take for example: Chin-Chin, Ciguato,Ciguapa, Guiro, Guira, Higuera, Casabe,Yuca, Guayiga, Chola, Mabi, Mani,Cahuil, macana, buren,hamaca, conuco,jataca, jacana, cacheo, bija, comejen, hicotea,, catua, carey, baguada, guaragua, etc etc. And this does not include the places names of much of our countryside, the names or flora and fauna, again etc.
Does it not strike you as rather interesting that the "extinct population would leave more linguistic and aspects of material culture more so than all the African Tribes combined? HOw can you discount all this and why?
When I mentioned that some people that did looked Taino did not have mtdna of native extraction, there is a very simple reason for this. MTDNA is passed down from mother to sons/daughters but only her daughters can pass down the mtdna, not the male children.Although they still pass on the Native genetic markers, another test is needed to determine if there is any Native makers in said subject. I myself took a nuclear dna test and my markers were 42 percent Indian.
As far as the high cheek bones of Africans and the eye epicathic fold is concerend, these observations you make are extremly superficial. Aside from Cheek bones there is the forehead slant, shovel shaped incisors, RH positive in O blood groups, that also indicate high levels of Indigenous genetic contribution. Are you familiar with Jose de Jesus Alvarez A-B-O blood group study conducted in the DR in 1948, all of which pointed to a hihgh level of Native genetci contribution to the population of the DR?
You mention as well many well known African musical contribution to the DR population. But for arguments sake, are you familiar with Dominican Jacana? Or Mahuita? These musical forms are also part of who we are and I dare anyone to give these forms with obvious Taino names an African genesis.
I find it interesting that in Haiti where the populations is 100 % more African than in the DR, they will readily tell you that "RA-RA" music is both African and INdian, yet we in the DR who have our own form of the music "ga-ga" claim that it is solely African. Makes you wonder why we want, or have an apologetic need to be more African Than we are and always, always at the expense of the Indian.
It may be that we domincans are more Indian/African than we would like to admit. IT is very intersting indeed how we argue over Indian versus African when both of these people of color who had very common cultura traits, would in turn make it either African/Spanish or Indian/Spanish and not what I believe it to be Afro/Indian. Its like yeah we black but hell we need to be white too and the indian? Lets keep it as minimal as possible. And on we go with our obviuos Taino material culture, and monumental linguistic and genetic contribution. Why?