Both Japan and Belgium have been civilized for thousands of years with highly evolved economic cultures. They approach "self-actualization" on the Maslow scale and have per capita GDP among the highest in the world. There is little comparison to the DR.
Some facts can't be spun in a PC manner.
Good to know, now for the FACTS! belgium has no natural resources, so how DiD they become a 1st World country? Dont you find it ODD that Diamonds arent found anywhere in Belgium but it is the worlds principal trading market? Dont diamonds, which are found in strifed AFRICAN countries FUND CIVIL WARS? Who benefits from these civil wars? ISNT THIS THE DEFINITION OF BLOOD MONEY? You steal resources from lands that have them and keep the money and funds in the lands that dont. Thats how it works right?
You have it all wrong my man. The Belgian monarchie and some in their closest company did profit in that particular time from their colony but thats it and that "richness" stayed and still remains in that particular establishment.
Belgium being a 1ste world country now has nothing to do with that, that comes from innovative companies, very well educated and creative scientists and a very specialized industry with some unique assests nowhere found in the world and thats THE primary export product which allows Belgium to stay on top.
All of these TECHNICAL and INNOVATIVE companies you mention...ALL OF THEM, make products which can only be constructed using materials from AFRICA. Hey you got a cell phone, laptop, mp3, PDA, etc? You cant make the battery without Lithium from africa, Or the circuit board without Molybdenum or Chromuim, nor Gold, Plata, Copper, Magnesium, Maganese, Zinc, OIL, etc. you name it it is all found in Africa.
But yet in the face of such natural wealth you cannot name one 1st World AFRICAN country. The closest you get is the Republic of South Africa(where the Europeans have remained in charge). My friend what you say is ridiculous is the truth. One cannot equate POLTICAL LIBERATION WITH ECONOMIC LIBERATION. Big deal there are no "colonies on the continent of Africa". But there are many leaders who dance at the strings pulled by former colonial powers in order to preserve the status quo of "you give me what you got and I ll take it". The fact of the matter is if ANY AFRICAN country were to renegotiate the terms of the master/slave relationship this is a country which will find itself and its economy manipulated by "World Forces"(read: World Bank, IMF, UN, WHO, USAID) or military embargo. Thats how you get Banana Republics. The US did/does it with Cuba...and Haiti....and Iraq...and Afghanistan(if you didnt read the press release last week by the DOD that Afghanistan is believed to have a TRILLION DOLLARS OF NATURAL RESOURCES). And the Europeans do it with Africa.
You have countries going through awfully genocidal repressive civil wars for the sole purpose of making people rich. Or course these same people dont actually fight the wars they created the sides and funds the animosities and buy the weapons. And then go on TV in the world stage and say "how wrong this is". They never say that sold the weapons to fight to both sides.
TRUTH: Idi Amin and Robert Mugabe were in the pocket of the Americans and the British until they started expropriating lands from white farmers and white businessmen. But no one ever debated WHY he did this. The Africans are from Africa but represent NO WEALTH in the country. All the people with means, power, influence and industry were Indian expatriates or European settlers. So we loved the guy until he decided to exert a little provincial autonomy for the betterment of his populace...Just like Saddam Hussein, General Samoza, General Norieaga, Salvador Allende. Then you have idiots like Rafael Trujillo and Fulgencio Bautista who are so far out the loop of common decency yoyu wonder who would support a government led by them.
I dont think you know your own history and how much wealth a tiny country like Belgium has garnered from African colonialism.