?very "under developed" country has resources, well most of them. It all depends on how many people can access them and history tells and still does that offen in such countries only the "happy few" can.
It depends on how many people those resources have to support.
It's simple math, really...
You might want to know that PICHARDO IS one of those connected Dominican intellectuals...:cheeky:
?very "under developed" country has resources, well most of them. It all depends on how many people can access them and history tells and still does that offen in such countries only the "happy few" can.
Peculiar you say this, because Belgium is a 1st World country in Western Europe, although it has no resources. Apparently ALL of Belgium wealth comes from economic interests in former African colonies.
So it benefits Belgium and their interests if African countries perpetually stay in a state of civil war, despair and political confusion. Wasnt that the reason they killed Patrice Lumumba? Kwame Nkrumah? Using proxies and mercenary armies to keep Robert Mugabe in power so colonial interests could stay wealthy(and undisturbed)?
And ASIA is the largest continent on earth.
So why would it be any different here on Hispaniola? Same tune, different player. There MUST be some natural resource of worldly gain that keeps Haiti and all these other Caribbean countries mired in poverty. Because it is the definition of evil if you re doing it just as game.
Whatever.When talking about distribution or management of resources, i.e. political economy, it is never simple math. It is a fairly complex task that involves resources management, which in turn involves the development and maintenance of solid institutions to do a more or less efficient job. The fact that political economy is not simple math explains the struggles of equitable resources distribution in every nation on earth really. Developing and underdeveloped countries just have a tougher time because of history, geopolitics etc?Solid institutions CAN be resource multipliers. Africa is the richest and largest continent on earth. Its well known problems are certainly not the result of lack of resources or overpopulation; but it is the glaring lack of solid, efficient institutions to guarantee efficiency and a minimum level of equity in resource management in MANY African countries. Of course, this is due to historical factors that we don?t need to get into here.
hahaha! o jajajaja! I stand by my statements. Belgium HAS NO NATURAL RESOURCES, so where does it wealth come from relative to its size?
And as well as their are people prospecting for gold in the hills of the western Dominican Republic, they are just as well looking in Haiti. Somehow all the riches wind up in Europe but the materials arent. What say you?
hahaha! o jajajaja! I stand by my statements. Belgium HAS NO NATURAL RESOURCES, so where does it wealth come from relative to its size?
And as well as their are people prospecting for gold in the hills of the western Dominican Republic, they are just as well looking in Haiti. Somehow all the riches wind up in Europe but the materials arent. What say you?
The topic is: 57% of dominicans are living in poverty.
So I will tell you why some people will never leave the poverty behind.
I was in a birthday party in santiago in a well-to-do lawyer's house. It was a party given in her huge apartment, about 25-30 people. In addition to her family doing their part, they had 2 well-dressed waiters serving food and drinks to the guests. The waiters were father-son team. The son was active and working like a machine. On the other hand, the dad was slow and uninterested in working. Soon we realized, he was drunk. I found his hidden drinks behind the bar. He was serving 3 drinks and drinking one from under the bar. Within 2 hours of the party, he was already drunk and wobbly. We had to tell him to stop this act or take a walk out the door. Of course, he denied "no fue yo".
So there you have a typical example: you give them work and the first thing they do is screw up. You think he will be offered to serve in any other party or recommended to other people to have him working in their private parties?
This is just one example.
AZB
Whatever.
"Resources" include human innovation also.
And generally "resources" in one specific geography tend to be limited. The more people exist to be supported by those finite resources, the less each person benefits from those resources.
The reason "sanctions" work as a means of behavior modification is ~because~ they recognize specific resources are limited. Forbidding oil into Saudi Arabia or coal into West Virginia does not accomplish any BM.
And ASIA is the largest continent on earth.
.
Chicken and egg. A given geography has to have resources enough to afford an edumacational system.Human innovation implies good education among other things, all of which imply structures or institutions, which require a body (political system, government ) to devise them. Right? Wrong? or just whatever?
Pn said:Efficient infrastructures can be RESOURCES MULTIPLIERS. If the infrastructure is poor the amount of resources available versus how many people there is irrelevant. No?
Whatever.PN said:Just one of many ways to define 'Sanctions'. You can also prevent Saudi Arabia from selling its oil, from refining it by denying expertise, parts etc...But the simple point is that Saudi Arabia may have the largest reserve of oil possible, without the structures to exploit it and the will to utilize the revenues for the good of the Saudi citizenry the size of the reserve makes no difference whatsoever in the life of the ordinary citizen. Which connects with the original point of resource development and distribution.
Whatever.PN said:I meant to say Africa is the 2nd largest continent. I stand corrected.
send kids to college since alot of them are now free.
Peculiar you say this, because Belgium is a 1st World country in Western Europe, although it has no resources. Apparently ALL of Belgium wealth comes from economic interests in former African colonies.
The topic is: 57% of dominicans are living in poverty.
So I will tell you why some people will never leave the poverty behind.
I was in a birthday party in santiago in a well-to-do lawyer's house. It was a party given in her huge apartment, about 25-30 people. In addition to her family doing their part, they had 2 well-dressed waiters serving food and drinks to the guests. The waiters were father-son team. The son was active and working like a machine. On the other hand, the dad was slow and uninterested in working. Soon we realized, he was drunk. I found his hidden drinks behind the bar. He was serving 3 drinks and drinking one from under the bar. Within 2 hours of the party, he was already drunk and wobbly. We had to tell him to stop this act or take a walk out the door. Of course, he denied "no fue yo".
So there you have a typical example: you give them work and the first thing they do is screw up. You think he will be offered to serve in any other party or recommended to other people to have him working in their private parties?
This is just one example.
AZB
We must have gone to different schools.
Of course. But "infrastructure" takes time...and money. It is a "developed" resource, not a "natural" resource. Big difference and one that cannot be minimized.You very well may have. Peacenik is correct in that infrastructure does serve as a form of efficiency multiplier. The richest gold mine in the world has little value if you lack the knowledge and means to extract, refine, transport and market the ore.
Both Japan and Belgium have been civilized for thousands of years with highly evolved economic cultures. They approach "self-actualization" on the Maslow scale and have per capita GDP among the highest in the world. There is little comparison to the DR.RDob said:That requires an educated, motivated work force. Japan and Belgium are two of the most natural resource-poor countries in the world, yet their economies are comparatively solid. That's because they invested in their people, and subsequently became world leaders in industry, technology and finance.
Maybe in 500 years the DR will look like today's Belgium or Japan.DRob said:There's no reason the same thing couldn't happen in DR.
So what? His style rubs some folks the wrong way. However, his substance is hard to argue.DRob said:As for AZB's comments, well, it's little more than a window into the heart of an elitist. He could have just as easily talked about the son's (i.e. "new generation's") hard work ethic, but no, he just found it easier to disparage poor folks again, which once more says a lot more about his quality (or lack of therein) than anything else.