IMO, it all depends whom and what we are talking about.
1. Let's face it. We all shall die. Most likely from some illness in later years. So, do you accept, that some MdG doctor (Do we know whether he is really a 'medico'?) can deny you a renewal of your residency (which, let us assume you have held for 20 years) because you have some cancer (as we know is not contageous)?
2. Is this 'doctor's' decision bound by any rules, list of illnesses, a second opinion?
3. Breast cancer in women, colon cancer in men.
Throw them out, yeah....
Ken, I wish you an old age in good health.
donP
No question that bad things happen to good people. And the older you get, the more likely this is. I am sure I know this better than you, since i think that I have more miles under my belt than you.
But the issue in my mind is whether or not these people are being deported, or denied residency. If being deported, then a terrible injustice will have been committed.
If residency not renewed but they can continue to live in the country and their homes, I understand the decision. ( It would be interesting to know how their serious medical condition came to the attention of the authorities. )
The possibility of this happening was signaled by the information on changes in residency that was reported on DR1. As I recall, both income and health were to be looked at more closely for people beyond a certain age.
Maybe it will happen to me when I go to renew in 2014. I hope not, but there are no guarantees. Also, I have never felt that I was guaranteed permanent residency. I chose not to become a citizen and still have no intention of applying for citizenship. Which means that every few years I must renew my residency, which means that the government has retained the right to not renew. I don't like to hear that it has happened to good people, but I respect the right of the government, any government, to decide who is to have official residency.
I wish the OP would answer the question asked and repeated by various posters: are these people being deported?
It would also be interesting to know whether the people themselves were represented or are now being represented by an attorney and whether they are actively protesting the decision.