New equipment is expensive. Used here is still spendy, and once again the condition is an unknown.Here is just a thought .. again , im not a " restaurant./ bar owner"..
But Logically would it not have taken a lot less money to fix the kitchen , even buy brand new, rather than to give all this money to the Lawyers , plus all the losses accumulating every day that its closed .
imho Rocky has a less than zero chance of
getting the place back + making a profit ...
it does not seem mathematically even possible
so the question begs , what is the end game in such a scenario.
If the equipment were bad, an experienced restauranteur would have known it the first couple of days after the contract signing at the latest. But how long did the place operate before the foreclosure and equipment issue excuse?
I would bet a years minimum wage there is a clause in the contract where the seller acknowledges the equipment is in acceptable condition. If that clause is missing, Big Frank could sue the lawyer who drew the deal for malpractice. I've bought a LOT of existing businesses that included vehicles and equipment, and that clause is ALWAYS front and center, and the equipment was ALWAYS inspected and approved before closing.
Besides, since a prior long-tenured operating manager went with the sale, that manager had intimate knowledge of the condition of all the equipment and would be essential in determining the state. One would assume he gave an accurate accounting to his boss.
This great guy Rocky had plenty of time to determine the condition of the equipment. It seems the "the equipment is bad" is just an excuse to weasel out of paying the balance in an attempt to recover some portion of a bad investment.