My 2 cents worth
Everyone in this world has the obligation to live. A baby/child is unable to live without someone supplying those things needed to survive, ie., food, shelter etc. So from day one life is a process of learning and teaching. What you teach and how you teach it usually determines how others learn and live. Society as a whole has determined that not everyone has teaches or has learned the best way to live so rules and laws are established as guideposts as to how life should be lived. Society has also determined that not living by these rules and laws requires a consequence and therefore punishment. What punishment is applied and the consistency of that punishment usually determines if society at large learns the benefits of living by the rules and laws that are in place. All punishment is a means of control through fear. If the rules and laws are rigorously enforced then you fear the possibility of repeating the grade if you fail to study, attend and do your schoolwork. You fear the possibility of losing your job if you fail to show up at work on time. You fear the fine that is levied for throwing litter. You fear the time required behind bars for robbing a bank. Most people in a civilized society obey the rules and laws because of the possible punishment if they deviate from those set standards. Then again there are those that live on those fears and push the possibility of getting caught to the limits. There are also those that operate when FURIOUS which is a state in which the brain becomes disconnected from the mouth and or muscles of the body. All to say that not everyone is the same and the same is true with children.
The instrinsic worth of a spanking in the teaching of a child between that which is right to that which is wrong has always been endemic in the punishment of children. The reason that a number, not all, of the psychologists now have an abhorrent opinion of spanking as a means of punishment is because so many parents through the years have derogated from what a spanking should consist of. As this is such a touchy subject the bureaucratic omnipotents have decided to rule this method of punishment as barbaric rather than adduce a proper implementation of a spanking. It is because of the actions of so many maladroit parents in their inability to distinguish the difference between a spanking, beating or whipping that have caused the lack of ratiocination in some of the posts in this thread.
There never has been or will be a school for being a proper parent because of the varied opinions as to what is a proper parent and the varied opinions concerning punishment or lack thereof. If people could concur on these issues then there could be a fortuitous construction of such a school.
Concerning the teachings of the Dominican children here it has been my experience that the majority of the Dominicans teach virtually nothing good to their children. The major item is their failure to teach respect for other people, animals and property. There is also the failure to teach honesty. As to punishment in this country it is virtually non-existent in any form starting from the parent to the government. A parent here at times will get overwhelmed by the misbehaving of their child that they will go into that state of FURIOUS (see above). In this state anything they say or do is not punishment it is in fact abuse. We could go on forever as to what the Dominicans failed to teach their children but that would be useless as the majority of the adults are not in any position to teach anything to anyone.
The major problem with punishment is that a lot of people don?t know when, why or how to apply it and their failure to be CONSISTANT. To me punishment is a tool to be used in helping me to teach my son what is right and wrong. The form of punishment I use is determined by the infraction committed. Besides teaching right from wrong I have set up rules that are to be followed at all times and this is not to my being a despot but rather to the fact that I want him to be safe and grow up to be an adult. An example is when my son was 2 ? and he ventured out towards the dirt roadway and I grabbed him and explained why he couldn?t go there. The second time this happened I grabbed him and spanked him on the bottom one time and said no and explained. About 2 weeks later he tried it again and I quickly grabbed and spanked with no explanation. He didn?t test me again for about 2 months. When he turned 5 and acquired more freedom I taught him to stop before entering the street and look left then right first. I only had to punish him twice for not looking. Now at the age of 7 he always looks first as it has become a habit. Do I regret having spanked my son, no and I never enjoyed it but I knew it was a tool that had to be used. This same routine has been used for coming when called, biting other children, spitting at other children and using foul language. The first time is always with an explanation but after that it is a consistent and swift smack on the butt. Taking away the TV seems to work for all other situations but time out never works because of his imagination. Yelling is something I don?t do or allow and my son is always called by his name John and NEVER co?o. He is told at least once EVERY day that he is hansome, smart and that I love him. I never spank him more than once and always on the butt only and never in anger (furious). Having explained my philosophy how many myopic people out there think my actions by spanking are incivility?
Everyone in this world has the obligation to live. A baby/child is unable to live without someone supplying those things needed to survive, ie., food, shelter etc. So from day one life is a process of learning and teaching. What you teach and how you teach it usually determines how others learn and live. Society as a whole has determined that not everyone has teaches or has learned the best way to live so rules and laws are established as guideposts as to how life should be lived. Society has also determined that not living by these rules and laws requires a consequence and therefore punishment. What punishment is applied and the consistency of that punishment usually determines if society at large learns the benefits of living by the rules and laws that are in place. All punishment is a means of control through fear. If the rules and laws are rigorously enforced then you fear the possibility of repeating the grade if you fail to study, attend and do your schoolwork. You fear the possibility of losing your job if you fail to show up at work on time. You fear the fine that is levied for throwing litter. You fear the time required behind bars for robbing a bank. Most people in a civilized society obey the rules and laws because of the possible punishment if they deviate from those set standards. Then again there are those that live on those fears and push the possibility of getting caught to the limits. There are also those that operate when FURIOUS which is a state in which the brain becomes disconnected from the mouth and or muscles of the body. All to say that not everyone is the same and the same is true with children.
The instrinsic worth of a spanking in the teaching of a child between that which is right to that which is wrong has always been endemic in the punishment of children. The reason that a number, not all, of the psychologists now have an abhorrent opinion of spanking as a means of punishment is because so many parents through the years have derogated from what a spanking should consist of. As this is such a touchy subject the bureaucratic omnipotents have decided to rule this method of punishment as barbaric rather than adduce a proper implementation of a spanking. It is because of the actions of so many maladroit parents in their inability to distinguish the difference between a spanking, beating or whipping that have caused the lack of ratiocination in some of the posts in this thread.
There never has been or will be a school for being a proper parent because of the varied opinions as to what is a proper parent and the varied opinions concerning punishment or lack thereof. If people could concur on these issues then there could be a fortuitous construction of such a school.
Concerning the teachings of the Dominican children here it has been my experience that the majority of the Dominicans teach virtually nothing good to their children. The major item is their failure to teach respect for other people, animals and property. There is also the failure to teach honesty. As to punishment in this country it is virtually non-existent in any form starting from the parent to the government. A parent here at times will get overwhelmed by the misbehaving of their child that they will go into that state of FURIOUS (see above). In this state anything they say or do is not punishment it is in fact abuse. We could go on forever as to what the Dominicans failed to teach their children but that would be useless as the majority of the adults are not in any position to teach anything to anyone.
The major problem with punishment is that a lot of people don?t know when, why or how to apply it and their failure to be CONSISTANT. To me punishment is a tool to be used in helping me to teach my son what is right and wrong. The form of punishment I use is determined by the infraction committed. Besides teaching right from wrong I have set up rules that are to be followed at all times and this is not to my being a despot but rather to the fact that I want him to be safe and grow up to be an adult. An example is when my son was 2 ? and he ventured out towards the dirt roadway and I grabbed him and explained why he couldn?t go there. The second time this happened I grabbed him and spanked him on the bottom one time and said no and explained. About 2 weeks later he tried it again and I quickly grabbed and spanked with no explanation. He didn?t test me again for about 2 months. When he turned 5 and acquired more freedom I taught him to stop before entering the street and look left then right first. I only had to punish him twice for not looking. Now at the age of 7 he always looks first as it has become a habit. Do I regret having spanked my son, no and I never enjoyed it but I knew it was a tool that had to be used. This same routine has been used for coming when called, biting other children, spitting at other children and using foul language. The first time is always with an explanation but after that it is a consistent and swift smack on the butt. Taking away the TV seems to work for all other situations but time out never works because of his imagination. Yelling is something I don?t do or allow and my son is always called by his name John and NEVER co?o. He is told at least once EVERY day that he is hansome, smart and that I love him. I never spank him more than once and always on the butt only and never in anger (furious). Having explained my philosophy how many myopic people out there think my actions by spanking are incivility?