The truth about HIV and AIDS
<B><FONT SIZE=4><P ALIGN="CENTER">The Truth about HIV and AIDS</P>
</FONT><FONT SIZE=2><P ALIGN="CENTER">Jim Hinsch - July 2002</P>
<P>Its about Money.</P>
</B><P>In a prior commentary, I pointed out how the government always throws the public a bone (a lie) to hide the fact that the MAIN reason for various law and actions are about MONEY. From the war on drugs to the war on terrorism. Read on.</P>
<B><P>Defining AIDS.</P>
</B><P>In the USA, AIDS is defined as having any one of a variety of diseases (25-30) that are typically associated with a compromised immune system. One cannot "catch" AIDS, as AIDS is merely a description of a condition, not a "thing" that can be passed from person to person. </P>
<P>Some places define AIDS as having given CD4+ T cell count lower than some number. Other places (Africa) define AIDS as every disease known to screw up the immune system, with some exceptions such as cancer and malnutrition.</P>
<P>So get that out of your heads right now. One does not "catch" AIDS. It is any one of a bunch of diseases that rarely cause harm in healthy individuals, but because the immune system is in bad shape, does cause harm. For example, when a person catches pneumonia and can't fight it off because of weakened immune system, we call this "AIDS".</P>
<B><P>The Cause of AIDS.</P>
</B><P>So what causes AIDS? That is where the controversy comes in. Some define a thing called "immune system infection", AKA, HIV. Others say no such thing has ever been isolated. Whatever, the onset of AIDS is quite well correlated with a weakened immune system. Notice I said "correlated". Some think that is the cause, others think that is just a symptom.</P>
<P>Regardless, the number of people in the USA with compromised immune systems, or call it HIV if you like, has remained constant at about 1 million since 1985 (
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/tour/step4.htm). All kinds of diseases have been able to propagate with that many people with compromised immune systems. Hence, the condition called "AIDS". So, while AIDS shot up exponentially, we're really saying people are dying from things they should not die from and it's due to all these people with weakened immune systems.</P>
<P>Having this "compromised immune system" described as immune system infection, AKA, HIV, does not mean you will get sick and die from something that a healthy person would not die from. It's just that by definition, when you do die from one of these things, it typically is because your immune system is screwed up. Suffice to say, if your immune system is whacked, you likely will not be able to fight off any one of a whole bunch of diseases. They call this AIDS.</P>
<P>Some say HIV is a specific retrovirus that whacks the immune system, which in turn makes people get sick and die from things a healthy person would not get or die from. Others say no way, no such thing as "HIV" virus has ever been isolated, that it doesn't exist. Yes, there are people with compromised immune systems. But it is controversial whether or not this is caused by a virus.</P>
<B><P>Weakened Immune Systems.</P>
</B><P>Here's the bottom line. People are dying from things they didn't used to die from. By definition, all those that die this way have screwed up weak immune systems.</P>
<P>So what causes a screwed up immune system? In the USA, primarily the toxic affect of certain drugs. That's not the ONLY cause but the most predominate cause. That includes drugs that are legal, illegal, injected, not injected, but especially powerfully toxic drugs such as AZT. That's right, it is WELL KNOWN that AZT, meant to fight HIV which it does a good job of, has VERY toxic side affects including a weakening of the IMMUNE SYSTEM. </P>
<P>We are not even sure we should be fighting HIV at all because we are not sure it even exists, let alone causes AIDS. It could be a harmless and common condition or may not even exist. Remember, HIV is not actually detected, we assume it's presence because of the presence of antibodies and we fight it because we assume AIDS will develop if we don't.</P>
<P>Too much heroin or cocaine or nitrate sniffing, there goes the immune system. There is a huge correlation between heavy users of both legal and illegal drugs and immune system infections (called HIV), that in addition take AZT, and then get AIDS. Throw a immune system killing toxic drug like AZT in someone with an immune system infection due to excessive toxic drug use, and you will get AIDS. Other causes include chronic disease (including sexually transmitted diseases, malnutrition., </P>
<P>See
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/data/pddrdrugaids8.htm.</P>
<B><P>We have been Lied to.</P>
</B><P>We've been thrown a truck load of lies, half-truths, omissions, and improper statistical data. We are lied to by our governments day in and day out, from the reason we go to war, the reason for certain laws, the reason for the war on drugs, the motive behind various USA political and military activities ... and yes, the governments have lied to us about AIDS and HIV as well.</P>
<P> </P>
</FONT><P><A HREF="http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/cthomas.htm"><B><FONT SIZE=2>Dr. Charles Thomas</B></FONT></A><FONT SIZE=2>, Molecular Biologist and former Harvard and Johns Hopkins Professor: </P>
</FONT><I><BLOCKQUOTE>"The HIV-causes-AIDS dogma represents the grandest and perhaps the most morally destructive fraud that has ever been perpetrated on young men and women of the Western world,"</I> <FONT SIZE=1>(Sunday Times (London) 3 April 1994)</FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<I><BLOCKQUOTE>"AIDS has been a disease of definition. If we said that it didn't exist and didn't pay for it with taxpayers' money, it would disappear in the background of normal mortality."</I> <FONT SIZE=1>(Penthouse April 1994)</FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<I><BLOCKQUOTE>"I feel that for scientists to remain silent in the face of all this doubt is tantamount to criminal negligence."</I> <FONT SIZE=1>(Spin June 1992)</FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<P><A HREF="http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/pduesberg.htm"><B><FONT SIZE=2>Dr. Peter Duesberg</B></FONT></A><B><FONT SIZE=2>,</B> Professor of Molecular Biology University of Berkely: </P>
</FONT><I><BLOCKQUOTE>"There are no slow retroviruses, only slow retrovirologists."</I> <FONT SIZE=1>(Spin June 1992)</FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<I><BLOCKQUOTE>"They have hyped up HIV into this super-rapist but in reality the damn thing can hardly get an erection."</I> <FONT SIZE=1>(Times of London 11 May 1992)</FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<I><BLOCKQUOTE>"Epidemiology is like a bikini: what is revealed is interesting; what is concealed is crucial."</I> <FONT SIZE=1>(PNAS Feb. 1991)</FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<I><BLOCKQUOTE>"When AIDS patients' bodies finally break down from the effects of these anti-viral drugs, they say, 'Now the virus has become resistant, and the drugs have lost their effectiveness.' What really is happening is the toxicity of the drugs builds up to a point where the patient cannot stand it anymore. And, of course, they say it was the virus -- rather than the entirely inevitable and predictable toxicity of these damned drugs."</I> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<FONT SIZE=2><P>Dr. Bernard Forscher, former editor of the U.S. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences: </P>
<P>"The HIV hypothesis ranks with the 'bad air' theory for malaria and the 'bacterial infection' theory of beriberi and pellagra [caused by nutritional deficiencies]. It is a hoax that became a scam." (Sunday Times (London) 3 April 1994)</P>
<P> </P>
<B><P>Dr. Ralph Moss:</B> Author of <I>The Cancer Industry:</P>
</FONT><BLOCKQUOTE>"The paradigm that was laid down for how to milk the cancer problem is basically the same paradigm which is being followed in milking the AIDS problem."</I> <FONT SIZE=1>(Penthouse Dec. 1995)</FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<P><A HREF="http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/rgiraldo.htm"><B><FONT SIZE=2>Dr. Roberto Giraldo</B></FONT></A><FONT SIZE=2>, Specialist in Internal Medicine, Infectious and Tropical Diseases, New York</P>
</FONT><I><BLOCKQUOTE>"HIV tests are meaningless. A person can react positive even though he or she is not infected with HIV. The tests are interpreted differently in different countries, which means that a person who is positive in Africa (or Thailand) can be negative when tested in Australia. There is no justification for the fact that most people have not been informed about the serious inaccuracy of the tests. The error has catastrophic repercussions on thousands of people. Since people are reacting positive on tests that are not specific for HIV, let?s please stop labeling them as ?HIV positive?"</I> </BLOCKQUOTE>
<B><FONT SIZE=2><P>Do Your Own Research.</P>
</B><P>Search the web. Read both sides of the arguments, studies, statistics, and reports. I think you'll overwhelmingly come to the same conclusions. However, you still have to wear a condom. There are still dozens of unpleasant sexually transmitted diseases, pregnancy, and it can't be good for the immune system to be mixing up body fluids with a lot of different people. </P></FONT>
You cannot catch AIDS or HIV from sex.
Seman up the rear end is not good for the immune system because it naturally fights to stay alive, fighting your immune system.
The same diseases are found in similar frequencies in HIV positive and HIV negative intravenous drug users, and the overall mortality in the two groups is the same. See
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/tour/step6.htm
See
http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/tour/step10.htm