I have been following this thread from the beginning. Yet every-time I click on the new updated posts I am hopping to see pictures of boobs. :lick:
I have been following this thread from the beginning. Yet every-time I click on the new updated posts I am hopping to see pictures of boobs. :lick:
That lactose intolerant stuff doesn't apply to momma's titty does it, or just cows' lactose?
I would be interested to see how many babies are fed mostly on mother's milk. I am willing to bet that the number goes to well over 50%.
The 7% is only for babies who caretakers are also substituting/supplementing their diet. Strictly speaking that number should be 0% as the advice to give babies extra vitamine D is still universal. so the percentage could relate to the 7% who don't give vitamin D.
As far as formula feeding only goes - from my familial experience most mothers breastfeed, at least until they must return to their jobs and even then often leave bottles for the babies. This gets supplemented with baby formula, usually mixed with some form of mineral water like Spa or Evian. Of course, this is not a representative sample.
The advice on giving Vitamin D is NOT universal LLLI | FAQ on Vitamin and Fluoride Supplements
I would be interested to see how many babies are fed mostly on mother's milk. I am willing to bet that the number goes to well over 50%.
The 7% is only for babies who caretakers are also substituting/supplementing their diet. Strictly speaking that number should be 0% as the advice to give babies extra vitamine D is still universal. so the percentage could relate to the 7% who don't give vitamin D.
As far as formula feeding only goes - from my familial experience most mothers breastfeed, at least until they must return to their jobs and even then often leave bottles for the babies. This gets supplemented with baby formula, usually mixed with some form of mineral water like Spa or Evian. Of course, this is not a representative sample.
I find this to be one of the oddest things in the DR, why on earth would people pay for things that are free and healthier?!
I so miss common sense!
Uuuuuuhhhh, No. A baby needs NO supplementation of ANYTHING with breastmilk for the first 6 months. EXCLUSIVE breastfeeding is recommended for infants 6 months and younger.
SHALENA
Uuuuuuhhhh, No. A baby needs NO supplementation of ANYTHING with breastmilk for the first 6 months. EXCLUSIVE breastfeeding is recommended for infants 6 months and younger.
SHALENA
Starting to addict babies to vitamin supplements before they have ever tasted a cookie is weird.
Shalena, I refer to my post below. Your position is not universally supported it seems.. Apperently there is no concensus in the medical field. Where I live all babies are under advice to receive additional vitamin K + D supplements, whether or not they are breastfed.
For babies that do not receive supplementation studies show that their bone development is statistically significant less developed.
Just to be clear; I fully support breastfeeding.
I find it peculiar how people have lived thousands of years and never had Vitamin ? deficiency until some health agency said they did. I dont think those studies will blatanty show bone defects as opposed to it is assumed they would unless they purchase So & So Corporation's patented nutritional supplement endorsed by a global health organization.
Stannous fluoride will prevent dental cavities. It was observed that in West Texas, where the artisan well water had small amounts of fluoride, children rarely developed cavities.
There is no reason to give it to children before they have teeth. Fluoride toothpaste is adequate for the purpose.
Just look it up, already.
The John Birchers in the 1950's claimed that fluoridation in the public water supply was a Communist trick to poison the entire population. Observe how that turned out.