So, are you telling me I should start such thread?....miguel is so funny.....but truthful....i kind of like "bang friendly" hotels :laugh:
I do not care if your post is 10 days or 10 years old.
I'm just telling you to shut your mouth and show some respect for other members.
The OP clearly stated his question in a mature and professional way. There was no need for you to reply like that.
Costa Azul- why are you being judgemental on the guy? He asked a simple question, and probably dones't ned to hear your elist remarks. And gee, maybe he has enough game to pull chicas back to his room with out spending a cent.
Exactly.Costa Azul- why are you being judgemental on the guy? He asked a simple question, and probably dones't ned to hear your elist remarks. And gee, maybe he has enough game to pull chicas back to his room with out spending a cent.
No law needed for that to be a problem.Let's suppose for a moment that sexual discrimination laws existed in the DR. (Yeah I know,John how much are you drinking right now) But think about it. How willing would a manager of Hilton or Sofitel be in coming up to you in the lounge bar and saying "Hey who is the chick your sitting with". Say what dude? Let's go right over here in the corner and have a little talk..
Your thoughts.
JOHN
So you are simply concerned that someone might not realize that some guests may be pros?I'm just suggesting, to state it properly and remove the ambiguity!
Hooker friendly, whore friendly, prostitute friendly, puta friendly, person I have a sexual contract with friendly! :cheeky: These work.
Then it's crystal clear!
Being judgemental, was NOT my intention. :ermm:
"Bang friendly" might be misconstrued with allowing one, to bring their gun! :cheeky:
So you are simply concerned that someone might not realize that some guests may be pros?
Why would anybody care about what others do in their rooms and why would you care if they might care?
Your holier-than-thou bullsh!t is a waste of bandwidth and bytes.:tired:
I am not concerned! What a joke! irate:
I did not claim or imply that you are concerned, hence the question mark.I am not concerned! What a joke! irate:
I did not claim or imply that you are concerned, hence the question mark.
I was just inquiring about a possibility that you might have a sincere misguided motive here because it looks like you simply have a holier-than-thou idiotic attitude.:tired:
Actually, you are is also fine for a question based on a rising tone or the punctuation.Scroll up Malibook.
You put a question mark, after a statement, which wasn't a question. You should have changed the words you are, with are you, to make it a question. You also, should have put a comma, after the words so and realize.
Quite sloppy. :ermm:
Actually, you are is also fine for a question based on a rising tone or the punctuation.
No need for commas there since I wouldn't pause in speaking nor is there any potential for different meanings.
What's sloppy is your ridiculous excessive use of commas.
Do you really speak with so many pauses?
Eeeeeeeeeeew!<snip>....
and stop putting their nose in places it does not belong.