Everything Is Relative
Rooting corruption from Dominican society is a pipe dream. But that's okay. I'll take the good with the bad. Norway has very little corruption, but you couldn't pay me to live there. Boring!
What we should strive for is moderate reductions in corruption and moderate improvements in government operations. I hate to be in your face, Rocco, especially after you quoted me, but that was what Leonel achieved. It's not that there was no corruption in the Fernandez administration - there was plenty of it. But there was a noticeable decrease in overall government corruption compared to previous administrations - or at least in the appearance of corruption to regular people. And I thought that his government performed better because of it.
In big American cities like New York, Chicago, Philadelphia and Boston, voters tend to not evaluate politicians based on whether they are corrupt - most of them are. Rather, they evaluate them on whether they are capable of getting things done within the prevailing system.
A professor of mine back in my school days once compared Chicago to Philadelphia in regard to corruption. He said that in Chicago, to build a bridge, there would be bid rigging, political favoritism, kick-backs, nepotism, bribery and union slush funds. After all that, you get your bridge.
In Philadelphia, to build a bridge, there would be bid rigging, political favoritism, kick-backs, nepotism, bribery and union slush funds. After all that, you DON'T ever get your bridge.
Leonel is Chicago. Hipolito is Philadelphia.
Rooting corruption from Dominican society is a pipe dream. But that's okay. I'll take the good with the bad. Norway has very little corruption, but you couldn't pay me to live there. Boring!
What we should strive for is moderate reductions in corruption and moderate improvements in government operations. I hate to be in your face, Rocco, especially after you quoted me, but that was what Leonel achieved. It's not that there was no corruption in the Fernandez administration - there was plenty of it. But there was a noticeable decrease in overall government corruption compared to previous administrations - or at least in the appearance of corruption to regular people. And I thought that his government performed better because of it.
In big American cities like New York, Chicago, Philadelphia and Boston, voters tend to not evaluate politicians based on whether they are corrupt - most of them are. Rather, they evaluate them on whether they are capable of getting things done within the prevailing system.
A professor of mine back in my school days once compared Chicago to Philadelphia in regard to corruption. He said that in Chicago, to build a bridge, there would be bid rigging, political favoritism, kick-backs, nepotism, bribery and union slush funds. After all that, you get your bridge.
In Philadelphia, to build a bridge, there would be bid rigging, political favoritism, kick-backs, nepotism, bribery and union slush funds. After all that, you DON'T ever get your bridge.
Leonel is Chicago. Hipolito is Philadelphia.