I must say there is some patient investors on the North Coast.This will not pan out for 8 to 10 years
Short of a global recession, I disagree.I must say there is some patient investors on the North Coast.This will not pan out for 8 to 10 years
What is your time line estimate?Short of a global recession, I disagree.
Oh yeah, like everyone is hanging on your every word.Since neither of you have any insider knowledge or real insight nobody cares for you unsupportable opinions![]()
For a global recession?What is your time line estimate?
I wouldn't bet against that.For a global recession?
1st quarter of 2023.
For removing the shacks on the beach?
Within a few weeks after Semana Santa.
That sounds very Logical. yesFor a global recession?
1st quarter of 2023.
For removing the shacks on the beach?
Within a few weeks after Semana Santa.
I wouldn't bet against that.
they may raze the beach shacks pronto so the owners can take back their property. However building a hotel, casino, condo or plaza I believe is a super long way off ( as in ten years). I think about all the defunct unoccupied massive hotel complexes on the North coast that have been vacant for 10 years or least long enough to have trees growing out of the bricks and windows. That latest A.I savior of Cab. can be had for 60 bucks a night.For a global recession?
1st quarter of 2023.
For removing the shacks on the beach?
Within a few weeks after Semana Santa.
I know local people who have operated on the beach for many, many years, am I not allowed to feel bad for them?
No, we don't know that. Your statement is incorrect.We all know, regular Dominican's will not be allowed to frequent the beach, am I not allowed to feel bad them?
That might be true, only time will tell.I personally will miss the days I spent at the various bars/restaurants. What am I going to do now...go sit on a towel on the beach for the day...no drinks or food? I doubt it very much. It will be like Playa Alicia...a horrible beach to hang around on.
The land donated to the government and accepted by the President of the DR were at each end of the beach. That guarantees public access since the beach is not surrounded by private land.Sure, the owners have every right. I would sell if I owned that beach also. I read here the land was "donated" to the government, I suppose there are many benefits to that. That said, I still say that gentrification is not good for poorer locals and I am sad for the loss of the beach.
That latest vendor meeting seems to suggest that at least the vendors believe that it is imminent.
Why did they meet if nothing is going to happen?A lot of DR1'ers are forgetting or ignoring the fact that El Presidente made a special trip here and stood in the beach parking lot and took possession of the gifted land right then and there and announced to whomever was willing to listen that the change was happening. I personally believe that once high season is over that the chit will hit the fan,meaning the bulldozers will show up.
I will go with , "What is 1 to 3 years?".I must say there is some patient investors on the North Coast.This will not pan out for 8 to 10 years
We don't know that they are squatters and I doubt they are. Presumably, they are either renting from the the owner, or subletting from someone who is renting from the owner. However, once the owner cancels the leases, if they don't vacate, then they will be squatters and have to be evicted.Yes of course, but they were and are squatters with no valid title.
No "regular Dominicans" will be prevented from going to the beach, however, with no bars, restaurant, chairs and tables in the middle of the beach, many Dominicans will no longer want to go there. Activity will be limited by design to both ends of the beach.I know local people who have operated on the beach for many, many years, am I not allowed to feel bad for them? We all know, regular Dominican's will not be allowed to frequent the beach, am I not allowed to feel bad them?
If as you say some are renting from the actual Owners , would it not be the duty of those Owners to INFORM their Tenants that at some point in the near future , that they need to Vacate and their Lease will be Voided , because the Land under them was and IS now DONATED to another owner ?We don't know that they are squatters and I doubt they are. Presumably, they are either renting from the the owner, or subletting from someone who is renting from the owner. However, once the owner cancels the leases, if they don't vacate, then they will be squatters and have to be evicted.
We don't know that they are squatters and I doubt they are. Presumably, they are either renting from the the owner, or subletting from someone who is renting from the owner. However, once the owner cancels the leases, if they don't vacate, then they will be squatters and have to be evicted.
They will be able to bring there coolers and spend the day? Will I be able to bring a cooler and spend the day? If front of condos and/or resorts. I would hazard to guess....there will be some hassling from overzealous guards going on...prevented...no, dissuaded, yes. We all know the way things go.No "regular Dominicans" will be prevented from going to the beach, however, with no bars, restaurant, chairs and tables in the middle of the beach, many Dominicans will no longer want to go there. Activity will be limited by design to both ends of the beach.
I seriously doubt any of the businesses are renting from the actual landowners, but I could be wrong .If as you say some are renting from the actual Owners , would it not be the duty of those Owners to INFORM their Tenants that at some point in the near future , that they need to Vacate and their Lease will be Voided , because the Land under them was and IS now DONATED to another owner ?
or does the DR not have any Rules of Law such as this to protect Tenants who are paying Rent in Good faith . ..
I am only asking.